Wednesday, March 10, 2010 Register   Login
You are here:  Advocacy * Letter Writing Campaign in Newspapers   Search
Jonathan explains how to handle Repository

Jonathan's recommended procedure for Letters to the Editor

I understand the frustration some may have with trying to get a letter to the editor published in the Canton Repository. I have experienced some frustration myself. My recent letter took one whole month to appear in the newspaper from the time I submitted it, but it did eventually get published. I have not always experienced such difficulty in getting a letter in the newspaper, but here is what worked for me in this case to finally get it published.

1.       When I submit a letter to the Repository and have not seen it published within a week or two, I call them and leave a message at (330) 580-8544. I tell them when I sent the letter and tell them that I am contacting them to find out if they received my letter and to find out if and when it will appear in the newspaper. If they have not returned my call by the next day then I will e-mail them at letters@cantonrep.com to say the same thing.

2.      If you have facts that appear in your letter, be prepared ahead of time to provide credible web-addresses to back up your statements because they will likely ask for proof of statements that need to be proven (for example in my letter: the quotes from Obama). You won’t have to worry about this step if your entire letter is opinion. You will also need to confirm that the letter was written in your own words and was not just a copied form letter taken from the Internet.

3.      If a letter has not appeared within 3 weeks or more, my next step is simply to "bug" them. Now I do this respectfully. But if they have not printed a letter by that time, the only way they will print it is if you are persistent. Parenthetically, I kept track of other letters that had been published after mine had been sent to them that were clearly written after mine and asked the Repository why those letters were printed before mine.
 
This may seem like a lot of work, and sometimes it is not that hard to get a letter published. But if you really want the letter published and you are having trouble, this is what has worked for me.
 
Canton Repository Letter Writing Guidelines
 
Letters must include your name, address and daytime phone number, but we publish only your name and city or township. Letters longer than 300 words will be edited or returned. Anyone who submits a letter that has been taken in part or entirely from another source, including an Internet site or e-mail, will be banned from the letters page for one year.
 
Here’s how to get your letters to us:
 
Mail: Letters to the Editor
       The Repository, 500 Market Ave. S., Canton, Ohio 44702-2193
FAX: (330) 454-5745
 
For letters on the 2008 elections, letters need to arrive at the Repository by Wednesday, October 22, so that we have space to use as many as possible and time to verify and fact-check them.
 Print   
Enter Title

Local Letter to the Editor getting creamed by pro-death responders!

Local opinion writer and son of Executive Director, Mark Stevenson, Jonathan Stevenson wrote a Letter to the Editor that appears in the Canton Repository's Thursday, October 16th edition that clearly explains Barak Obama's position on Abortion and explains that Obama will sign the Freeedom of Choice Act, which will effectively wipe out all state laws restricting abortion. If you can get online and comment on facts that Jonathan presented, it will show the Canton Repository it made the wrong choice in endorsing Obama for president. Please go and give your comment on the facts that Jonathan brought to light.

 Don't Support 'Obamanation' of Abortion - Thursday, October 16, 2008 

During a debate, Barack Obama was asked, "At what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?" Obama claimed the question was "above his pay grade," but his actions clearly indicate many instances when he decided babies shouldn't obtain human rights.

Obama highlighted these instances, saying, "Throughout my career, I've been a consistent and strong supporter of reproductive justice, and have consistently had a 100 percent pro-choice rating with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America."

Picking Joe Biden — one of only 19 senators endorsed by Planned Parenthood this year — continues that theme.

Obama strongly disagreed with the Supreme Court decision upholding the partial-birth abortion ban, saying, "I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman's right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women."

The remedy proposed by pro-abortion activists is FOCA. Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL, explained, "... the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) would effectively repeal the Federal Abortion Ban and other federal restrictions on abortion care, as well as codify the protections of Roe nationwide."

Obama — co-sponsor of FOCA — said in a speech last year, "The first thing I'd do as president is, is sign the Freedom of Choice Act,"

Obama voted against the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act mirroring the federal language despite his campaign claims to the contrary.

Anyone accepting the medical/scientific fact that a genetically distinct human life begins at conception can't assist these actions with their vote without blood on their hands.

Claiming to be pro-life is easy. But in November, actions speak louder than words. Don't support the "Obamanation" of abortion.

JONATHAN STEVENSON,

PLAIN TOWNSHIP

 Print   
Home  |  Pro-Life Resources  |  Advocacy  |  Contact Us  |  About Right to Life of Stark County
Copyright 2008 by Right to Life of Stark County   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use